On March 22, 2024, law enforcement officials from Mozambique’s Criminal Investigation Service (SERNIC) and the Tax Authority seized a container at Maputo port that was going to Dubai and contained 651 pieces of elephant ivory hidden in a shipment of bags of corn. Officials at a leading environmental non-governmental organization are trying to motivate Mozambique and Angola to take stronger steps to prosecute ivory trafficking.

        On April 8 and 9, 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) held public hearings on the Request for the indication of provisional measures submitted by Nicaragua in the case concerning Alleged Breaches of Certain International Obligations in respect of the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Nicaragua v. Germany).

        On April 5, 2024, Europol released its new report, entitled “Decoding the EU’s most threatening criminal networks.” It presents the characteristics of the criminal networks that pose the highest threat.

        On April 4, 2024, the Brazilian Federal Police uncovered, under “Operation Fiction or Reality,” a sophisticated international arms trafficking network between the United States and Brazil. The traffickers used a company that purportedly imported cinematographic paraphernalia to conceal their activities, which included supplying firearms and accessories to criminal factions and militias in Rio de Janeiro. 

        On March 25, 2024, the Department of Justice unsealed an indictment in the Eastern District of New York dated January 30, 2024, in which seven nationals of the People’s Republic of China were charged with conspiracy to commit computer intrusions and conspiracy to commit wire fraud.[1]  The alleged activities took place over at least 14 years, with the known date range identified in the indictment as 2010 through January 2024.[2]  In the past few years, the seven defendants and their conspirators have been given names such as “Advanced Persistent Threat 31” (“APT31”) and “Violet Typhoon” by cybersecurity researchers.

        On April 2, 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice announced the sentencing of two persons for gun trafficking charges.  In February 2024, the U.S. prosecuted and sentenced four persons for firearms trafficking involving Haiti and the Dominican Republic. On March 25, two members of the U.S. House of Representatives and two members of the U.S. Senate introduced a bill to provide for an annual report on prosecution activities of the Coordinator for Caribbean Firearms Prosecutions of the U.S. Department of Justice.

       On April 1, 2024, the United States Department of Justice announced the detention of 23 persons after the return of a 50-count indictment alleging the trafficking of cocaine, fentanyl, heroin, and meth and related crimes in the Houston and Galveston areas.  According to the indictment, the defendants operated under the control of the Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG).

   The so-called ‘special military operation’ that the Russian Federation has waged against Ukraine since February 2022 has had, directly or indirectly, several consequences and repercussions in its relations with Europe and other Western countries. One of them has been what appears to be a tit-for-tat accusation for the perpetration of acts of genocide before and during World War II. The purpose of this article is to examine these allegations in chronological order and to offer a brief evaluation. As will be ascertained, even though these accusations concern events that go as far back as 90 years, they have invariably been connected to the Russian aggression against Ukraine.

On March 18, 2024, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) decided to impose a fine of £5.95 Million on Nailesh Teraiya, formerly the sole controller and chief executive of Indigo Global Partners Limited (Indigo), and to prohibit him from carrying out any regulated activity.

On March 26, the King’s Bench Division issued a 66-page opinion, stating that Julian Assange has a real prospect of success on 3 of the 9 grounds of appeal.  It has given the United States Government  an opportunity to offer assurances that would address those groups of appeal.  Unless the U.S. gives satisfactory assurances, the Court will grant leave to appeal on those grounds.